.png)
By Charvi Rana
Abstract
Deepfake technology, powered by artificial intelligence, has revolutionized media creation by enabling the production of hyper-realistic but synthetic videos and audio. While offering potential benefits in entertainment and education, its misuse poses profound ethical, legal, and societal challenges. In India, the rapid proliferation of deepfakes has raised concerns about their potential to deceive, manipulate public opinion, and damage reputations. This paper examines the multifaceted impact of deepfake technology within the Indian context, analysing its ethical dilemmas, legal complexities, and broader societal implications. Through case studies and analysis of existing legal frameworks, the study identifies the urgent need for enhanced regulations, technological defences, and public awareness campaigns to mitigate these risks effectively.
Keywords: Deepfake, Artificial Intelligence, India, Ethical implications, Legal challenges, Manipulation, Political implications, Psychological impact, Public awareness, Cybersecurity
I. Introduction
Deepfake technology represents a pivotal advancement in artificial intelligence, allowing the creation of remarkably realistic yet artificially generated media content. While promising in fields such as entertainment and education, its emergence has also ushered in significant challenges and concerns, particularly regarding its potential misuse. In India, the proliferation of deepfakes has underscored fears about their capacity to generate misleading content, undermine trust, and manipulate public perception. This paper aims to explore the intricate impact of deepfake technology in India, delving into its ethical implications, legal intricacies, and broader societal consequences. By examining specific case studies and current legal frameworks, we seek to highlight the critical need for strengthened regulatory frameworks, technological solutions, and heightened public awareness to effectively address the risks posed by deepfakes. The objective is to offer a comprehensive understanding of deepfake technology's implications and propose actionable recommendations to safeguard individual rights and uphold societal integrity in the digital era.
II. Deepfake Technology and Its Implications
Imagine the shock of stumbling upon a video online that depicts you engaging in actions you've never taken and speaking words you've never uttered. This unnerving scenario vividly illustrates the dangerous implications of deepfake technology, where digital manipulation seamlessly swaps one's identity with another's, rendering individuals susceptible to malicious exploitation. Considering this, the following discussion delves into the ethical and legal ramifications of deepfake technology. By examining various prominent cases and scrutinising existing laws, this paper aims to advocate for stronger legal safeguards. According to McAfee, approximately 22% of Indians have encountered fake political deepfakes, unveiling a host of concerns ranging from cyberbullying to the dissemination of fake pornographic content and scams. Such deceptive practices not only impersonate public figures but also erode trust in the media and even threaten the integrity of elections and historical accuracy. McAfee suggests that the actual number of victims may surpass reported cases, underscoring the urgent need for heightened awareness and robust legal measures, as a recent survey found that over 75% of Indians have seen deepfakes and at least 38% have been targeted by a deepfake scam in the past year.[1]
A. Case Study: Rashmika Mandanna
On October 13, 2023, Eemani Naveen, a devoted fan of Rashmika Mandanna, created and shared a video aiming to boost followers for his fan account. Mandanna's face was digitally superimposed onto a video featuring British-Indian influencer Zara Patel. While Naveen intended to enhance the visibility of his fan page by leveraging Mandanna's popularity, the creation and distribution of the deepfake video raised ethical and legal concerns.[2]
This incident highlighted the harmful implications of deepfake technology, which uses digital manipulation to create synthetic media by seamlessly replacing one person's likeness with another’s. Coined in 2017 by a Reddit user, deepfakes have evolved to encompass various forms of deceptive digital content, including realistic images of non-existent individuals. Prominent figures like Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, and Tom Cruise have been featured in deepfake videos, highlighting the increasing sophistication of this technology.[3] Despite current limitations in technology that make it challenging to discern between real and artificial content, the rapid pace of technological advancement suggests that this distinction may be blurred further in the future.
B. Legal Ramifications
After widespread outrage, the Delhi Police filed a case. Naveen's actions, under Sections 465 and 469 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), are considered forgery and defamation. Section 465 pertains to creating false documents or electronic records with the intent to cause damage or harm. Naveen's deepfake video misrepresented Rashmika Mandanna's identity, constituting a false digital record. Section 469 addresses forgery with the intent to harm reputation. By sharing the deepfake video, Naveen intended to exploit Mandanna's likeness without consent, causing reputational damage. This dual application of forgery and defamation illustrates the severe legal consequences of deepfake misuse.[4]
Under Section 66C and 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000[5], individuals who fraudulently or dishonestly utilize the electronic signature, password, or any other unique identification feature of another person can face imprisonment for up to three years and a fine of up to one lakh rupees. Section 66E deals with privacy violations, including capturing, publishing, or transmitting a person's images in mass media without their consent. This offence carries a punishment of imprisonment for up to three years or a fine of up to two lakh rupees. Therefore, deepfake crimes involving such actions fall under these sections of the IT Act and can result in severe penalties.[6]
C. Fallout
Following meticulous scrutiny and interrogation, the Intelligence Fusion and Strategic Operations (IFSO) Unit traced the Instagram account of the alleged suspect to Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. Naveen, a 23-year-old resident of Guntur, was apprehended by the IFSO unit of the Delhi Police. He graduated with a B. Tech degree from Adhi College of Engineering and Technology in 2021 and completed a digital marketing certification course from Google Garage in 2019.[7]
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology invoked Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which deals with 'punishment for cheating by personation using computer resources.' According to this section, individuals convicted of cheating through personation using communication devices or computer resources may be subject to imprisonment for up to three years and a fine of up to one lakh rupees. Under this provision, the government has declared that creators of deepfakes will face imprisonment for three years.[8]
Expressing her distress, Rashmika Mandanna described the deepfake video incident as 'extremely scary,' highlighting how the realistic nature of the video could easily deceive viewers. She voiced concern over the misuse of technology, emphasizing that such deepfakes not only tarnish reputations but also pose significant psychological distress to victims who find themselves portrayed in false and compromising scenarios.
Rashmika Mandanna again fell victim to a deepfake video generated by AI for the second time in six months. The video depicts her face seamlessly merged onto the body of Colombian model and content creator Daniela Villareal, posing under a waterfall in a strapless red bikini. Mandanna originally shared the video on her Instagram handle in April 2024. However, she has not responded to the disturbing incident yet.
III. Implications
A. Political Manipulation
These deepfake incidents are just the beginning, highlighting a growing problem as generative AI outpaces current regulations. The misuse of this technology in politics is particularly alarming. Deepfakes can create incredibly convincing but completely fake content, posing a significant threat in a diverse and politically charged country like India. Here, public opinion is heavily influenced by charismatic leaders and emotive issues, and deepfakes have the potential to distort reality and manipulate voter perceptions on a massive scale. This could lead to a polarized electorate, diminished trust in democratic institutions, and ultimately, the undermining of free and fair elections.[9]
During the 2024 Lok Sabha election, deepfake technology was used to manipulate political narratives. One instance involved a deepfake video featuring a cloned voice of Mahatma Gandhi endorsing a specific political party. Another viral video circulated on WhatsApp showed a Member of Parliament from the ruling party criticizing his opponent and urging support for the ruling party. These incidents highlight the risks associated with deepfake models, particularly Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), in manipulating democratic processes.[10]
Additionally, Muralikrishnan Chinnadurai, a fact-checker from Tamil Nadu, uncovered another case during a Tamil-language event in the UK. A woman named Duwaraka, supposedly the daughter of the deceased Tamil Tigers leader Velupillai Prabhakaran, was introduced despite having died in 2009. Chinnadurai identified glitches in the video, revealing it to be AI-generated. This discovery underscored concerns about misinformation spreading, especially with elections approaching in India. These instances demonstrate how deepfakes pose significant challenges to the integrity of electoral processes and public discourse.[11]
B. Case Laws
As deepfake technology evolves at a dizzying pace, the Indian judiciary stands on the brink of new legal challenges, navigating the delicate balance between privacy rights and freedom of expression through landmark rulings that could shape the future of digital integrity. The Indian judiciary has not yet directly addressed many instances involving deepfake technology due to its recent emergence and rapid evolution. However, existing case laws and judicial interpretations offer insights into how the legal system might navigate the complexities of deep fakes, focusing on principles of privacy, defamation, and freedom of expression.[12]
One significant ruling is in the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India[13], where the Supreme Court of India affirmed privacy as a fundamental right under the Constitution. While not directly related to deepfakes, this judgment has implications for digital privacy, suggesting that unauthorized use of personal data to create deepfakes may violate an individual's privacy rights. Similarly, in the case of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India[14], the court addressed the constitutionality of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, highlighting the importance of freedom of speech and expression while recognizing the need for limitations in certain circumstances. The judgment emphasized proportionality and specificity in laws restricting speech, which could influence how legislation and courts handle the misuse of deepfake technology.
These rulings, among others, establish a legal framework emphasizing the need to balance individual rights with freedom of expression. As deepfake technology becomes more prevalent, Indian courts will likely face challenges in interpreting existing laws and establishing new precedents, particularly concerning deepfakes.
C. Psychological Impact
Deepfake technology blurs reality, revealing alarming psychological effects on victims, including stress, anxiety, and PTSD, necessitating urgent action to address the mental health impact and potential erosion of societal trust. A study in the Journal of Medical Internet Research found that individuals, especially digital creators and public figures, experience significant stress and violation when their likeness is manipulated without consent. The tragic prevalence of "revenge porn" affects thousands, and deepfake technology could potentially impact millions more. Research by the Campaign End Revenge Porn revealed that 51% of victims contemplated suicide, highlighting the devastating psychological toll of non-consensual image dissemination, a harm that deepfakes could exacerbate.
Victims have reported symptoms akin to PTSD due to unauthorized image use in deepfakes, raising concerns about identity fragmentation and false memories from AI clone interactions. The use of AI clones in contexts like grief therapy also raises questions about interfering with the grieving process. Additionally, the rise of deepfakes for fraud adds stress to authentication processes, necessitating innovative solutions to alleviate psychological concerns and mitigate negative impacts on mental well-being and societal trust.[15]
D. Recent Advancements
In the ongoing battle against deepfake identity fraud, recent strides in detection technology offer hope to businesses, equipping them to fend off malicious impersonations and safeguard their reputations in the digital age. Advancements in deep learning algorithms signify significant progress, enabling the identification of subtle inconsistencies in deepfakes, like unnatural blinking or inconsistent lighting. Leveraging vast datasets containing authentic and manipulated videos, B2B solutions enhance detection capabilities to identify even the most sophisticated deepfakes.
This progress is crucial as studies indicate a doubling of the threat of deepfake identity fraud since 2022. Deepfakes can impersonate executives, spread misinformation about competitors, and fabricate news articles, posing substantial risks to businesses, including financial losses, legal complications, and erosion of trust among customers and partners. Robust deepfake detection technology has thus become indispensable for B2B entities, vital for safeguarding their interests and upholding their reputation in today's digital landscape.[16] By investing in cutting-edge solutions, businesses can better protect themselves against the escalating threat of deepfake identity fraud, maintaining trust in an era where authenticity is paramount.
IV. Analysis
Deepfake technology represents a double-edged sword in the context of India's rapidly evolving digital landscape. On one side, it offers remarkable advancements in media creation, potentially revolutionizing entertainment, education, and other sectors. On the other side, its misuse poses significant ethical, legal, and societal challenges that demand urgent and multifaceted responses. Beyond its legal implications, deepfake technology's societal impacts extend across various domains, including media credibility, political discourse, psychological well-being, and technological innovation.
A. Erosion of Trust in Digital Media
Pros: Deepfake technology can be used positively in fields such as entertainment and education, enabling creative and immersive experiences that were previously impossible. As deepfakes can create highly realistic simulations for use in movies, video games, virtual reality experiences, and educational tools, enhancing user engagement and learning experiences.
Cons: As deepfakes grow more sophisticated, the line between authentic and manipulated content blurs, fostering heightened scepticism among consumers. This erosion of trust threatens the credibility of news sources, social media platforms, and other digital mediums, ultimately shaping public perception and behaviour.
B. Social Cohesion and Polarization
Pros: In some contexts, deepfakes can serve as satire or parody, contributing to artistic expression and cultural discourse. They can be used to generate personalized content, offering new ways for individuals and businesses to engage with their audiences.
Cons: Deepfakes can undermine social cohesion by sowing doubt and suspicion among individuals and communities, potentially leading to increased polarization and further fragmenting society.[17]
C. Challenges to Democracy and Political Discourse
Pros: Deepfakes can also raise awareness about societal issues or educate the public through realistic simulations and scenarios. Deepfake technology can aid in creating realistic training environments for professionals such as surgeons, pilots, and emergency responders, improving preparedness and skill levels.
Cons: Manipulated videos depicting public figures engaging in fabricated actions or statements raise serious concerns about political propaganda, misinformation campaigns, and election interference.[18]
D. Global Implications and International Relations
Pros: Deepfake technology could be used in diplomacy and international relations for cultural exchanges or language education scenarios. It holds the potential to preserve and restore historical footage or create realistic recreations of events and personalities from the past, adding value to cultural and educational resources.
Cons: The global spread of deepfakes raises questions about jurisdictional challenges and the need for international cooperation in addressing malicious use and potential conflicts.
E. Psychological Impact on Victims
Pros: Ethical uses of deepfake technology could include therapeutic applications, such as helping individuals overcome social anxieties or phobias through controlled virtual scenarios.
Cons: Victims of deepfake manipulation may experience profound psychological distress, including embarrassment, anxiety, and loss of control over their image and reputation.
Addressing these concerns requires not only robust legal frameworks but also technological solutions for detection and prevention. Investing in advanced deepfake detection tools is essential to combat the spread of malicious content. Additionally, enhancing media literacy and digital literacy programs is crucial for empowering individuals to critically evaluate information and understand the potential dangers of deepfakes, fostering a more discerning and informed society. Collaboration among policymakers, tech companies, researchers, and civil society is necessary to develop comprehensive strategies to tackle the multifaceted challenges posed by deepfake technology.
V. Recommendations
In today's digital landscape, the proliferation of deepfake technology poses significant challenges to privacy, trust in media, and democratic processes. Addressing these challenges requires strategic legal reforms, robust enforcement measures, enhanced public awareness, advanced technological solutions, and international cooperation. These recommendations aim to comprehensively address deepfake risks while promoting digital integrity and societal trust.[19]
A. Amendments to Existing Laws
India's current legal frameworks, such as the Information Technology Act and the Indian Penal Code, provide a foundation for addressing deepfake-related offences. However, these laws require significant updates to keep pace with the evolving nature of deepfake technology. Specific provisions addressing the creation, distribution, and malicious use of deepfakes are necessary to ensure effective deterrence and prosecution. Additionally, legal interpretations must balance privacy rights with freedom of expression, navigating the complexities of digital rights in an AI-driven era.
B. Swift Enforcement
Strengthen enforcement mechanisms to ensure timely action against perpetrators of deepfake crimes. This includes collaboration between law enforcement agencies, cybercrime cells, and tech platforms to swiftly identify and prosecute offenders. Deepfakes erode trust in digital media, leading to scepticism and polarization within society. The psychological impact on victims is profound, necessitating support mechanisms such as counselling and legal assistance to help them cope with the distress and reputational harm caused by deepfake content. Furthermore, the potential for deepfakes to exacerbate issues like revenge porn highlights the urgent need for robust legal protections and public awareness campaigns to mitigate their harmful effects.
C. Public Awareness and Education
Introduce comprehensive media literacy programs in schools and communities to educate individuals about the existence and dangers of deepfake technology. This includes teaching critical thinking skills to discern between authentic and manipulated content. Launch public awareness campaigns through media channels, social platforms, and educational institutions to inform the public about the risks associated with deepfakes. Emphasize the importance of verifying sources and questioning the authenticity of online content.
D. Technological Solutions and Regulations
Invest in advanced deepfake detection technologies and collaborate with tech companies and research institutions to create effective algorithms for identifying and flagging deepfake content. Hold social media and digital platforms accountable for detecting and removing such content, and implement transparent reporting mechanisms for users to report suspected deepfakes. Establish regulatory bodies comprising legal experts, technologists, and civil society representatives to develop guidelines and standards.
E. Support for Victims
Establish support programs for victims of deepfake attacks, including psychological counselling and legal assistance. Ensure victims have resources to mitigate reputational harm and pursue legal recourse against perpetrators. Strengthen laws protecting individual privacy rights in digital spaces. Enhance provisions for consent-based use of personal data to prevent unauthorized use in creating deepfakes.[20]
F. Research, Development, and Collaboration
Promote ethical guidelines in AI development to prevent the misuse of technologies like deepfakes. Encourage tech innovators to prioritize ethical considerations and societal impact in their research and applications to mitigate the negative consequences of AI advancements. Foster international cooperation and agreements to address cross-border challenges posed by deepfake dissemination, ensuring a coordinated global response. Establish interdisciplinary task forces comprising government officials, industry leaders, and academics to study and address emerging challenges posed by deepfake technology, and foster collaboration for policy formulation and implementation.[21]
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, deepfake technology presents India with a nuanced landscape where the convergence of technological advancement and societal impact demands careful consideration and proactive measures. While deepfakes offer innovative possibilities in entertainment and digital creativity, their misuse poses grave threats to privacy, reputation, and democratic integrity.
The legal case involving Rashmika Mandanna vividly illustrates these risks. The creation and dissemination of a deepfake video not only violated her privacy and defamed her but also underscored the inadequacy of current legal frameworks in effectively addressing such digital crimes. Updating laws to explicitly cover deepfake-related offences, such as identity theft, forgery, and malicious impersonation, is crucial. This includes defining clear standards for liability and penalties that reflect the severity of the harm caused by deepfakes. Advancements in deepfake detection are crucial for mitigating risks. Investing in AI-driven tools to spot inconsistencies in video and audio can help combat deepfakes. Enhancing media literacy and digital education is essential, empowering the public to recognize and respond to manipulated content. International collaboration is also vital; sharing expertise and resources can help develop global standards to address the cross-border challenges of deepfake dissemination, strengthening defences against digital deception.
Despite these challenges, deepfake technology also presents opportunities when managed responsibly. In sectors like film and education, where simulated content can enhance storytelling or facilitate immersive learning experiences, regulatory frameworks can guide ethical use while minimizing risks. Embracing these positive applications while curbing malicious uses requires a balanced approach that integrates legal safeguards, technological innovation, educational initiatives, and international cooperation. To effectively address these issues Stakeholders must act decisively. Governments should reform laws to protect against digital deception while promoting innovation. The tech industry must develop reliable detection tech and adhere to ethics. Civil society should promote media literacy and digital education. Protecting rights like freedom of expression is crucial. India can lead in global AI standards by fortifying laws, advancing detection tech, and fostering international collaboration for a secure digital environment and democratic integrity.
In a nutshell, India stands at a pivotal juncture in managing the complexities of deepfake technology. Embracing these recommendations will enable India to proactively address the multifaceted challenges posed by deepfakes, ensuring a resilient approach that upholds digital integrity and societal trust in the digital age.
References
[1] ‘75% Indians Have Viewed Some Deepfake Content in Last 12 Months, Says McAfee Survey’ The Economic Times (25 April 2024) <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/75-indians-have-viewed-some-deepfake-content-in-last-12-months-says-mcafee-survey/articleshow/109599811.cms?from=mdr>.
[2] The Hindu Bureau, ‘Delhi Police Arrest Techie from Andhra Pradesh for Rashmika Mandanna Deepfake Video’ The Hindu (20 January 2024) <https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/delhi-police-arrest-techie-from-andhra-pradesh-for-rashmika-mandanna-deepfake-video/article67760419.ece>.
[3] ‘Main Accused in Rashmika Mandanna Deepfake Video Case Arrested, Says Police’ (The Indian Express20 January 2024) <https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/rashmika-mandanna-deepfake-video-accused-arrest-delhi-police-9118870/>.
[4] Rujuta Thete, ‘Another Deepfake Video of Rashmika Mandanna in a Bikini Goes Viral!’ (TheQuint27 May 2024) <https://www.thequint.com/news/webqoof/rashmika-mandana-deepfake-video-viral-red-bikini-fact-check>
[5] ‘basu’ (pib.gov.in) <https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1881404#:~:text=The%20IT%20Act%20penalises%20various>.
[6] ‘Rashmika Mandanna Deepfake: 3 Years Jail, Rs 1 Lakh Fine, Govt Sends Rule Reminder to Social Media Platforms’ (India Today7 November 2023) <https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/rashmika-mandanna-deepfake-3-years-jail-rs-1-lakh-fine-govt-sends-rule-reminder-to-social-media-platforms-2460104-2023-11-07>
[7] ‘“Did It to Get Instagram Followers”: How Man behind Rashmika Mandanna Deepfake Was Caught’ (Business Today21 January 2024) <https://www.businesstoday.in/india/story/did-it-to-get-instagram-followers-how-man-behind-rashmika-mandanna-deepfake-was-caught-414295-2024-01-21>.
[8] Subhash, ‘Section 66D in the Information Technology Act, 2000’ (kanoon junction) <https://indiankanoon.org/doc/121790054/#:~:text=Whoever%2C%20by%20means%20for%20any,extend%20to%20one%20lakh%20rupees.>.
[9] Meryl Sebastian, ‘AI and Deepfakes Blur Reality in India Elections’ www.bbc.com (16 May 2024) <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68918330>.
[10] ‘Deepfakes in Elections: Challenges and Mitigation’ (Drishti IAS) <https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/deepfakes-in-elections-challenges-and-mitigation>.
[11] ‘AI-Generated Fake Clip of Rahul Gandhi Swearing-in as PM Goes Viral’ (NDTV.com) <https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/ai-generated-fake-clip-of-rahul-gandhi-swearing-in-as-pm-goes-viral-5547725>.
[12] Subhash Ahlawat, ‘Exploring India’s Legal Framework against Deepfake AI Misuse’ (Subhash Ahlawat22 March 2024) <https://subhashahlawat.com/blog/unveiling-the-legal-framework-for-deepfake-ai-in-india>.
[13] ‘Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union of India on 26 September, 2018’ (indiankanoon.org) <https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127517806/>.
[14] ‘Shreya Singhal vs U.O.I on 24 March, 2015’ (indiankanoon.org) <https://indiankanoon.org/doc/110813550/>.
[15] Marlynn Wei, ‘The Psychological Effects of AI Clones and Deepfakes | Psychology Today’ (www.psychologytoday.com12 February 2024) <https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/urban-survival/202401/the-psychological-effects-of-ai-clones-and-deepfakes>.
[16] Team Ciente, ‘Deepfake Detection Technology Advancements: Statistics and Trends’ (Medium11 March 2024) <https://medium.com/@ciente/deepfake-detection-technology-advancements-statistics-and-trends-5dd3e05a3969> accessed 22 June 2024.
[17] ‘What Is Deep Fake Cyber Crime? What Does Indian Law Say about It? – CYBER CERT’ (cyber cert) <https://cybercert.in/what-is-deep-fake-cyber-crime-what-does-indian-law-say-about-it/>.
[18] ‘The Deep Impacts of DeepFakes and Cyber Fraud on Mental Health’ The Times of India (20 December 2023) <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health-news/the-deep-impacts-of-deepfakes-and-cyber-fraud-on-mental-health/articleshow/106145692.cms>.
[19] Samuel Henrique Silva and others, ‘Deepfake Forensics Analysis: An Explainable Hierarchical Ensemble of Weakly Supervised Models’ (2022) 4 Forensic Science International: Synergy 100217 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X2200002X>.
[20] Ashish Jaiman, ‘Debating the Ethics of Deepfakes’ (ORF27 August 2020) <https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/debating-the-ethics-of-deepfakes>.
[21] ‘The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Issues and Initiatives’ (EPRS | European Parliamentary Research ServiceMarch 2020) <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/634452/EPRS_STU(2020)634452_EN.pdf>.
Charvi Rana is a second-year law student at Jindal Global Law School. Her main areas of interest are Cyber Law, Space Law, Intellectual Property Law, and International Law.
Comments