- From Prompt to Property: Who owns ‘AI-Assisted’ work?
- ‘I’m a Science Enthusiast’: The Politics of Indifference
- Customary International Law and the ICJ’s Climate Advisory Opinion: From COP Politics to Judicial Authority
- Copyright Law and AI-Generated Music: Balancing Inclusion with Human Creative Fairness
- A Moment of Moral Reckoning: India’s Outrage and the Urgent Need to Rethink Minority Safety Across South Asia
- Bihar Electoral Roll Revision is a recipe for voter exclusion?
- Burial Rights and Religious Freedom in India: A Constitutional Analysis of Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Is India’s ‘Operation Sindoor’ legal under International Law?
Browsing: Featured
This article contends that Indian copyright law’s definition of authorship for computer-generated works (Section 2(d)(vi)) is insufficient for generative AI, as it predates such technology and overlooks the crucial requirement of human originality. It advocates for recognizing a distinct category of AI-assisted authorship to differentiate between minimal prompting and substantial human intellectual contribution in the creation of AI-generated content.
Discover how the increasing use of artificial intelligence in music production challenges traditional notions of creativity and authorship.
This tragedy did not occur in isolation. Bangladesh was already in turmoil following the death of student leader Sharif Osman Hadi, whose killing sparked widespread protests and anti‑India rhetoric.
Bihar’s electoral roll revision raises concerns about potential voter exclusion, especially for marginalized communities lacking specific documents.
The Supreme Court’s split decision in Ramesh Baghel highlights India’s struggle with secularism, questioning whether burial rights are constitutionally protected and if religious conversion justifies the denial of ancestral burial.
India’s “Operation Sindoor” raises complex legal questions under international law, particularly regarding self-defense against non-state actors and proportionality of response.
Was the Fourth Judges’ Case ruling based on law or speculation? This article critiques the Supreme Court’s reliance on hypothetical fears in striking down the NJAC, exposing flaws in its reasoning and the collegium’s vulnerability to executive influence.
Explore the intersection of TWAIL, Refugee, and IHRL. Delve into the impact on minority groups and the evolving approach to IL.
Currency shortage, crop failure, widespread protests and ultimately, chaos. The instinct to move is triggered. So, what do people do? They migrate to seek a safe…
The views and opinions expressed on PoliLegal are solely those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the official stance of the platform. While we aim to foster insightful discussions on the intersection of politics and law, our suggestions and recommendations are intended to enhance the existing state of affairs, acknowledging the substantial progress achieved through government schemes and policies. The content is for informational purposes only, and readers are encouraged to critically evaluate and engage in constructive dialogue. PoliLegal disclaims responsibility for any decisions or actions taken based on the material published here.
Subscribe to Updates
Stay informed on how politics and law shape society—join the conversation.
