- A Constitutional Invitation Never Sent: Jurists Allowed at the Top, Academics Refused at the Bottom
- SHANTI Act should not become another Bhopal
- Why Constitutional Structure Is More Than a Division of Power
- Rescuing the Law: What the ITPA Can Learn from Child Rights
- From Convenience to Appropriateness: The Unstable Core of Forum Non Conveniens
- Why India Should Change its Stance on the UNDRIP: A Case Study
- Need to Reclaim Female Agency over Veiling by Choice
- The Statutory Void: What the Reserved Verdict in ANI v. OpenAI Means for AI Training Data in India
Browsing: Featured
Constitutional lawyers often describe separation of powers in spatial terms. Power is divided, allocated, checked, and kept within boundaries. The first three articles of the United…
I. Introduction Child trafficking, as per the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (“UNODC”), is the exploitative use of children, regardless of their consent. According…
I. Introduction “Justice should be served” was the initial motto behind the establishment of the legal doctrine forum non conveniens (“doctrine”). It was a discretionary power…
I. Introduction Indian filmmaker and producer Imtiaz Ali has found himself in the midst of controversy over his remarks in a recent interview. The filmmaker exclaimed,…
I. Introduction India’s federal architecture rests on a delicate assumption: that the Governor, though appointed by the Centre, functions as a constitutional statesman rather than a…
I. Introduction The Ministry of Home Affairs (“MHA”) issued Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2026 (S.O. 3272(E)) on 22 June 2026, which was the tenth time…
I. Introduction … [I]f you describe your product as a munition in every press release, eventually a government takes you at your word …Peter Girnus, quoted…
I. Introduction One of the primary arguments that is consistently and boldly made against the claim of privacy is — If one has consented to it,…
This article contends that Indian copyright law’s definition of authorship for computer-generated works (Section 2(d)(vi)) is insufficient for generative AI, as it predates such technology and overlooks the crucial requirement of human originality. It advocates for recognizing a distinct category of AI-assisted authorship to differentiate between minimal prompting and substantial human intellectual contribution in the creation of AI-generated content.
Discover how the increasing use of artificial intelligence in music production challenges traditional notions of creativity and authorship.
The views and opinions expressed on PoliLegal are solely those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the official stance of the platform. While we aim to foster insightful discussions on the intersection of politics and law, our suggestions and recommendations are intended to enhance the existing state of affairs, acknowledging the substantial progress achieved through government schemes and policies. The content is for informational purposes only, and readers are encouraged to critically evaluate and engage in constructive dialogue. PoliLegal disclaims responsibility for any decisions or actions taken based on the material published here.
Subscribe to Updates
Stay informed on how politics and law shape society—join the conversation.
