- Can Indian law imagine a male rape victim?
- Rule-Making as Regulation by Stealth: The FCRA (Amendment) Rules, 2026 and the Shrinking Space for Civil Society
- Anthropic’s Fable 5 and Mythos 5 Shutdown: Why Export Control Law is the Wrong Instrument for AI Safety
- The Fundamental Right to Walk: The Supreme Court and The Constitution Put Pedestrians before Motorised Vehicles
- India Abolished the IPAB and Forgot to Build What Comes Next
- Who Causes a Machine to Create? Authorship and India’s Copyright Act
- India’s Constitutional and Cultural Crossroads: Harmonising Tradition and Modernity
- The Uniform and the Unequal: Why the Khaki Cannot Override Caste in Neeraj Ghaywan’s Homebound
Browsing: Featured
I. Introduction The Ministry of Home Affairs (“MHA”) issued Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2026 (S.O. 3272(E)) on 22 June 2026, which was the tenth time…
I. Introduction … [I]f you describe your product as a munition in every press release, eventually a government takes you at your word …Peter Girnus, quoted…
I. Introduction One of the primary arguments that is consistently and boldly made against the claim of privacy is — If one has consented to it,…
This article contends that Indian copyright law’s definition of authorship for computer-generated works (Section 2(d)(vi)) is insufficient for generative AI, as it predates such technology and overlooks the crucial requirement of human originality. It advocates for recognizing a distinct category of AI-assisted authorship to differentiate between minimal prompting and substantial human intellectual contribution in the creation of AI-generated content.
Discover how the increasing use of artificial intelligence in music production challenges traditional notions of creativity and authorship.
This tragedy did not occur in isolation. Bangladesh was already in turmoil following the death of student leader Sharif Osman Hadi, whose killing sparked widespread protests and anti‑India rhetoric.
Bihar’s electoral roll revision raises concerns about potential voter exclusion, especially for marginalized communities lacking specific documents.
The Supreme Court’s split decision in Ramesh Baghel highlights India’s struggle with secularism, questioning whether burial rights are constitutionally protected and if religious conversion justifies the denial of ancestral burial.
India’s “Operation Sindoor” raises complex legal questions under international law, particularly regarding self-defense against non-state actors and proportionality of response.
Was the Fourth Judges’ Case ruling based on law or speculation? This article critiques the Supreme Court’s reliance on hypothetical fears in striking down the NJAC, exposing flaws in its reasoning and the collegium’s vulnerability to executive influence.
The views and opinions expressed on PoliLegal are solely those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the official stance of the platform. While we aim to foster insightful discussions on the intersection of politics and law, our suggestions and recommendations are intended to enhance the existing state of affairs, acknowledging the substantial progress achieved through government schemes and policies. The content is for informational purposes only, and readers are encouraged to critically evaluate and engage in constructive dialogue. PoliLegal disclaims responsibility for any decisions or actions taken based on the material published here.
Subscribe to Updates
Stay informed on how politics and law shape society—join the conversation.
